Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1699

reference
654-tree-1
name
1699
tree-preservation-order

undefined

654-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006577 50.863556)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006492 50.863547,-1.006496 50.863564,-1.006508 50.863579,-1.006526 50.863591,-1.006550 50.863599,-1.006576 50.863602,-1.006602 50.863599,-1.006626 50.863592,-1.006645 50.863580,-1.006658 50.863565,-1.006662 50.863549,-1.006659 50.863532,-1.006647 50.863517,-1.006628 50.863505,-1.006605 50.863497,-1.006578 50.863494,-1.006552 50.863496,-1.006528 50.863504,-1.006509 50.863515,-1.006496 50.863530,-1.006492 50.863547)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL